NQ · model #19

CONTRA BULL / CONF BEAR

Three-way vote across 1h EMA200, 0809 bias, and London sweep. One dissenter (if 0809 or LON) → CONTRA BULL 58–63%. All-bear aligned → CONF BEAR 57%.

updated 2026-04-21
tier 2 both confluence-vote confluenceemavoteclose-direction

The setup

Three independent directional filters vote at the RTH open:

  1. 1h EMA200 — HTF regime (price above/below)
  2. 0809 zone bias — 08:00–09:00 ET bias direction
  3. LON sweep — which Asia extreme London swept

Two regimes fire lines on our chart HUD:

Entry rules

Backtest

backtest_contrarian_1vote.py, 1-bull-vote cohort profiled with 1h EMA200 as HTF filter:

DissenternClose BULL %Avg close pts
08099663.5%+60
LON11658.6%+29
HTF52.3%noise — filtered out

All-BEAR cohort (3 votes): 57% BEAR, −51pt avg.

All-BULL and 2-bull cohorts: flat. No edge; don’t fire.

The dead-end research that led here

Before landing on this setup we falsified a long list of confluence hypotheses:

The only edge that survived was the 1-vote contrarian pattern — and only when the dissenter is 0809 or LON, never HTF.

Why Tier 2

History